Net expected

[SHERGILL]

Hey guys I'm new to pokertracker can some explain how bad am I running or is this standard. And what is the odds of this happening. Thanks

[Ventilatorrr]

Based on your screenshot, it looks like that on average you would've won 300,000 chips more than you did, and there are two sharp drops when you got "unlucky".

Please note that it's really hard to get any meaningful data out of graphs like this for MTTs. Remember that you always lose all of your chips in a tournament unless you finish first - i.e. you can lose all your chips and still make money, so your chip graph can drop steadily while you're still making a profit. The net adjusted graph follows the actual chips won graph for all hands except all-ins, so the lines only diverge when there is an all-in.

[SHERGILL]

is this what you mean ? so what does the lines me and what actually shows how bad are we running

[Flag_Hippo]

In your screenshot there are significant spikes in the value of chips won/lost in some hands (for example at around the 900 hand mark) that deviate from the vast majority of the sample which doesn't look correct and will give incorrect data although it may be correct depending on the type and variety of tournaments you have been playing. If you open a Support Ticket and attach your hand history sample we can take at look at that for you and verify whether that's correct or not. With regards to what the lines actually mean then take a look at this guide:

Guide: All-In Equity

And for how that applies to your tournaments results see this guide:

Guide: Net Adjusted Winnings Graphs